Another King James Bible Believer

Subtitle

PROOF that the Vatican Versions Change from one edition to the next



PROOF that the new Vatican Versions are constantly changing from one edition to the next.

The Shifting Sands of Modern Textual Criticism.




Example # 1.


Luke 10:42 How many things are needed? "ONE THING" or "A FEW THINGS"?  Bible Babble Buffet at its Best.

 

King James Bible (ESV, NKJV, ASV) -  Luke 10:42 - But ONE THING IS NEEDFUL: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.”

 

NASB 1963-1977 editions - “But ONLY A FEW THINGS ARE NECESSARY, REALLY ONLY ONE, for Mary has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken away from her.”

 

NASB 1995 edition - “But ONLY ONE THING IS NECESSARY, for Mary has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken away from her.”

 

NIV 1973, 1978 and 1982 editions - "BUT ONLY ONE THING IS NEEDED. Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken from her."  

 

NIV 2011 edition - "BUT FEW THINGS ARE NEEDED - OR INDEED ONLY ONE. Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken from her."  

 

Did you notice that both the NASB and the NIV changed THE TEXT from one edition to another, AND that they REVERSED THEIR CHOICES?  What is going on here in Bible Babble Buffet Land?

 

http://brandplucked.webs.com/luke1042onethingneedfl.htm

 

Example # 2.


Notice again in Matthew 18:22 the TWO different ESV translations of the same verse. The first 2 ESV editions followed the Greek text. The second 2 ESVs just made up a number.

 

In Matthew 18:22 does the Lord say to forgive your brother not “until 7 times, but unto 70 times 7 times” (= 490 times - KJB, RV, ASV, NASB, NKJV, RSV, ESV 2001, 2007 editions, ISV, Douay-Rheims, St. Joseph NAB, ALL Greek texts)

or 77 times? (NRSV, NIV, ESV 2011, 2016 editions, Catholic New Jerusalem, Jehovah Witness New World Translation)?

 

 

Example # 3.


Look at the new "revision" of the ESV 2011. It came out in 2001 and they revised and changed about 300 verses in 2007 and then they revised it again in 2011 and then again in 2016. That’s 4 distinct revisions in just 16 years.


Take a look at what they have done with 1 Samuel 13:1. The ESVs have TWO different readings and they are BOTH wrong.


A similar thing happens with the constantly changing NASB. Notice it has TWO different readings depending on which edition you get and neither one agrees with any of the ESVs.  


From 1972 to 1977 they had 40/32 years, but now in the 1995 edition it reads 30/42 years, and BOTH ARE WRONG.


1 Samuel 13:1 Here we read: “Saul reigned ONE year; and when he had reigned TWO years over Israel, Saul chose him three thousand men of Israel.” reading - ONE/TWO years (NKJV, KJB, Geneva, Judaica Press Tanach, Orthodox Jewish Bible), or 40/32 (NASB 1972-77) or 30/42 (NASB 1995, NIV), OR 30 years/ 40 years (NET) or _____years and______and two years (RSV, NRSV, ESV 2001 edition, St. Joseph New American Bible 1970, Catholic New Jerusalem 1985), or "was 40 years old...and when he had reigned 2 years" (Amplified bible 1987) or "____years old and reigned 2 years" (Complete Jewish bible, Knox bible) or "was 30 years old...ruled for 42 years" (ISV, Common English Bible) or “32 years old...reigned for 22 years” in the 1989 Revised English Bible, or even "was 50 years old and reigned 22 years."! 


But wait. There's even more. The ESV 2001 edition had "Saul was________years old when he began to reign, and he reigned____and two years over Israel." But now the 2011 edition of the ESV has come out (I have a hard copy right here in front of me) and it now has the perhaps even more ridiculous reading of "Saul LIVED FOR ONE YEAR AND THEN BECAME KING, and when he had reigned FOR TWO YEARS over Israel, Saul chose 3000 men of Israel...". Think about it. "Saul lived for one year and then became king". They just get loopier and loopier, don't they? 

 


By the way, here is a more in depth study showing why the King James Bible got it right, as it ALWAYS does.


http://brandplucked.webs.com/1samuel131wordslost.htm

 

 

Example # 4.


Again, notice that in 2 Chronicles 36:9 the ESVs have come out with TWO different textual editions. The first one followed the Hebrew text while the second edition rejected the Hebrew text as well as both the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus LXX readings and went with the Alexandrinus LXX reading instead.  Not even the so called Greek Septuagint versions agree among themselves.


 2 Chronicles 36:9 in the Hebrew text reads that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he began to reign (Hebrew texts, KJB, NASB, NKJV, RV, ASV, KJB, RSV, NRSV, ESV 2001 edition, Douay-Rheims)

or he was 18 years old (NIV, Holman, NET, ESV 2007, 2016 editions!!! and once again the Catholic New Jerusalem)


http://brandplucked.webs.com/jehoiachin8or18.htm


And if you want to see much more like this, See The Ever Changing NASBs.


https://brandplucked.webs.com/everchangingnasbs.htm


And “What About The “New” NIV of 2011?”


The ever changing, gender neutered “new” 2011 NIV has changed about 40% of the verses from the way they read in the 1984 NIV, and they often change or add to the underlying Greek and Hebrew texts they previously followed. 

Here is THE PROOF.


https://brandplucked.webs.com/whatabouttheniv2011.htm

The  Ever Changing ESVs 2001, 2007, 2011 and 2016 editions = just another Vatican Version.


https://brandplucked.webs.com/theesv.htm

And last but not least, let’s take a look at the NKJV.

Is the NKJV the inerrant and 100% true Bible? You have GOT to be kidding, right?

https://brandplucked.webs.com/nkjvsameaskjb.htm




Small wonder the majority of present day Christians do not believe in the inerrancy of Any Bible in any language today.

 

Stick to the Book God has honored far above all others as his complete and inerrant words of truth and grace - the King James Holy Bible.

Reasons Why The King James Bible Is The Absolute Standard - God's Historic Witness to the Truth.

https://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm




ALL of grace, believing the book of the LORD - the King James Holy Bible.

Will Kinney