Another King James Bible Believer

Exodus 26:14 "badgers' skins", 

Exodus  26:14  “Badgers' skins”, “porpoise”, “goats”, “violet colored skins”, “seal skins”, “dolphin”, “sea cows”, "jackal", "blue skins" or “durable leather”?

 

Exodus 26:14 KJB - "Thou shalt make a covering for the tent of ram's skins dyed RED, and a covering of BADGER'S skins".  

ESV - "And you shall make for the tent a covering of TANNED rams' skins, and a covering of GOATSKINS on top."

NIV 1978 & 1982 editions, The Voice 2012 - "Make for the tent a covering of ram skins dyed RED, and over that a covering of hides of SEA COWS."

NIV 2011 edition - "Make for the tent a covering of ram skins dyed RED, and over that a covering of OTHER DURABLE LEATHER."

ISV (International Standard Version) - "You shall make a cover for the tabernacle of ram skins dyed red and a covering of DOLPHIN SKINS above that."

ASV - " And thou shalt make a covering for the tent of rams' skins dyed red, and a covering of SEALSKINS above."

NASB - "You shall make a covering for the tent of rams' skins dyed RED and a covering of PORPOISE SKINS above."

Holman Standard - "Make a covering for the tent from rams skins dyed RED, and a covering of MANATEE SKINS on top of that."  

The Jewish Family Bible 1864 - "a covering of TACHASH skins"

The Ancient Roots Bible 2010 - "a covering above THE MOHAIR SKINS"

So called Greek Septuagint - "and BLUE SKINS as coverings above."

 

Modern Greek bible - επικαλυμμα υπερανωθεν εκ δερματων θωων. = covering on top of JACKAL skins.

 

Many commentators are all over the board on what the Hebrew word means here. Some say it's probably such and such an animal and others some other, but most end up just admitting that they do not know for sure.  

 

I had one Bible critic write me saying: "The only reason the KJV et al translate "tachus" as "badger" is by false etymology to the Latin transliteration "taxus" which means "badger." Badger skins would have been a horrible choice to use to cover the tabernacle, as they are so small. Dozens of badgers would have had to have been chased down, caught, skinned, thrown out as unfit to eat, and then laboriously sewn together into a watertight covering.The Tachus was an animal so big that only a few of its hides were required to cover the entire tabernacle. And it was clean. It just wasn't native to Israel." 

 

 

The big problems with this guys criticism are two. First, the Latin Vulgate does NOT say Tachus or anything even remotely close to this.  The Latin Vulgate reads: "et pelles arietum rubricatas pelles ianthinas et ligna setthim" which translates as "And rams' skins dyed red, and the wood of shittim wood, the curtains of VIOLET COLORED SKINS."

 

"Violet colored skins." That is why the Catholic Douay Rheims and the Douay both read this way - because they translated from the Latin. Secondly, if you do a Google search or look in any Dictionary, you will not find any such animal called The Tachus. No such animal exists.  And yet this Bible critic tells us all kinds of fascinating details about the nature of this imaginary animal.

 

Some Bible critics even go so far as to say that the badger did not exist in Israel, Palestine or the desert area, yet all one has to do is do an internet search of "badger", oftenly referred to as "the pound for pound toughest animal on the face of the earth", and you will see that badgers DO exist in Israel and Palestine even today and have existed throughout history in almost every area on the face of the earth. 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_Badger

http://www.allposters.com/-st/Badgers-Photography-Posters_c99108_.htm

 

You can also go to this site and see what the Badger's pelt actually looks like and what a perfect covering for the Tabernacle in the wilderness it would have made.

 

http://marilynndawson.hubpages.com/hub/Badger-Skin-Ancient-Jewish-Bridal-Attire

 

Bible versions as well are totally confused and contradictory when it comes to translating this word, yet all the "scholars" have "gone to the Hebrew" like they tell us we need to do in order to see what this word means.  

The Hebrew word translated in the King James Bible and many others as “badgers” is tag-ghash and it is found 14 times in the Old Testament.  The King James Bible translates all 14 instances of this word as “BADGERS skins.” (See Exodus 25:5; 26:14; 35:7,23; 36:19; 39:34; Numbers 4:6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 and Ezekiel 16:10 - “I…shod thee with BADGERS’ skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen”

 

BADGERS SKINS

 

Bible translations that agree with the King James Bible's "badgers skins" are the NKJV 1982, Geneva 1599, The Bill Bible 1671, Webster's 1833, The Longman Version 1841, the Lesser Bible of 1853, The Revised English Bible 1877, Darby 1890, Young's 1898, the 1936 Jewish translation (Hebrew Publishing Company New York), Rotherham's Emphasized Bible of 1902, The Ancient Hebrew Bible 1907, New Life Bible 1992, The Word of Yah 1993, the KJV 21st Century 1994, Third Millennium Bible 1998, The Revised Geneva Bible 2005, Bond Slave Version 2009, Hebraic Transliteration Scripture 2010 - "BADGER'S SKINS", Holy Scriptures VW Edition 2010 - "covering of BADGER SKINS", English Jubilee Bible 2010, The Easy English Bible 2010,  the Natural Israelite Bible 2012 - "BADGER'S SKINS", The Far Above All Translation 2014 .  

Among foreign language Bibles that also read "BADGERS SKIN" are Luther's German Bible 1545 and the Modernized German Bible - "dazu über sie eine Decke von Dachsfellen." - "badger's skins",  the Spanish Sagradas Escrituras of 1569, Cipriano de Valera 1602, the Reina Valera of 1909, 1960 and 1995 as well as the Reina Valera Gómez of 2010 - "pieles de tejones", the Italian Diodati 1649 and the New Diodoti 1991 - "pelli di tasso", the Portuguese Almeida Corrigida E Fiel  and the A Biblia Sagrada em Portugues- "peles de texugo", the French Martin 1744 - "des peaux de taissons", the Russian Synodal Version - "и еще покров верхний из кож синих." = "and a covering of BADGERS SKINS.", the Chinese Union Version Traditional -  。, the Afrikaans Bible 1953 - “rooigeverfde ramsvelle maak en 'n dekkleed van robbevelle daar bo-oor.” = “a covering of badgers’ skin”, the Czech BKR Bible - “přikrytí také z koží jezevčích svrchu.” = “badgers’ skins”,  the Dutch Staten Vertaling Bible - “en daarover een deksel van dassenvellen.”, the Finnish Bible 1776 - “ja vielä sitten ylimmäisen peitteen tekasjim-nahoista.” = “badgers’ skins”, the Swedish Bible 1917 - “och ytterligare ett överdrag av tahasskinn att lägga ovanpå detta.” = “badgers’ skins”, the Norwegian Det Norsk Bibelselskap 1930 - “rødfarvede værskinn og ovenpå det et varetak av takasskinn.” = “badgers’ skins”,  the Arabic Smyth and Van Dyke Bible - وتصنع غطاء للخيمة من جلود كباش محمرّة. وغطاء من جلود تخس من فوق,  the 2009 Romanian Fidela Bible - "şi un acoperământ deasupra lui din piei de bursuc." = "and a covering of BADGERS SKINS" and the Modern Hebrew Bible - ערת תחשים מלמעלה׃ (Do a Google translation and you will see it comes up "badger")

Coverings of Badgers' Skins


Exodus 26:14

"Badgers' skins were tough, durable, non-porous, water repellent, and weather resistant. Protection was its purpose.

Beauty was inside the Tabernacle. The outside withstood the rain, storms, and the sun. Jesus withstood the torture, ridicule, and shame of the Cross for our sake. He weathered the storm that we might enjoy the beauty inside.

No dimensions were given for the two upper coverings of rams' skins dyed red or badgers' skins. The cleansing power of Jesus' blood (rams' skins dyed red) is immeasurable. The durable badgers' skins typify the boundless protection and security of believers in Christ.

Non-Christians never see the inner beauty of Christ. They only see the plain boring looking badgers' skins. We who are in Christ are able to enjoy the beauty of the gold!"  Distributed by Hope of Israel Baptist Mission  -   Copyright 1997-2006. 

The NASB says the covering would be "of PORPOISE skins" while the NIV 1984 edition has "sea cows", but the Spanish NIV says it was "dolphin skins" (pieles de delfín) and the NIV Portuguese version says it was "leather".  The 1989 Revised English Bible says: "dugong skins"; a dugong looks sort of like a walrus. The ASV says "SEAL SKINS". The RSV and the 2001 ESV both have "GOATSKINS".

 Lamsa's 1936 translation of the Syriac says "skins dyed with vermillion"; the 1917 JPS says "sealskins", Green's 'literal' has "DUGONG skins", and Dan Wallace's NET version and the NRSV say "FINE LEATHER", and the Holman Standard says "manatee skins" and the 2011 Common English Bible tells us it was "beaded leather" (whatever that might be).  

The Catholic Connection

Among the Catholic versions the 1610 Douay-Rheims and the 1950 Douay tell us it was "VIOLET COLORED SKINS". But then the 1968 Jerusalem bible says it was "FINE LEATHER", while the 1970 St. Joseph NAB has "TAHASH SKINS" and finally the 2009 Catholic Public Domain Version has settled on "SKINS OF VIOLET" once again.

Some versions like the Judaica Press Tanach and the Orthodox Jewish bible of 2011 have no idea what this animal was, so they just transliterate the word that for them has no specific meaning - "and tachash skins". There is NO such animal known as a "tachash".

Eugene Petersons' The Message tells us it was "dolphin skins".

But wait. There's more. Now the "new" New International Version of 2011 has come out and now they tell us it was not their previous "SEA COWS" but "OTHER DURABLE LEATHER" - in other words, "we have no idea what this was so we are just taking another wild guess."

 Scholarship is a wonder to behold, isn't it?  You always have to wonder what they will come up with next. Hey,  "badger skins, porpoise skins, sea cows, goatskins, violet colored skins, sealskins, dugong skins, manatee skins, dolphin skins, and durable leather" - they're all about the same, right? 

While wandering around in the wilderness for 40 years, badger's skins might be troublesome to get, but how many "porpoises" (NASB) or "sea cows" (NIV) or "manatees" (Holman) do you think they could have scrounged up? Possibly porpoises or sea cows would have been found in the Red Sea, but the wandering Israelites were not near the Red Sea during their wilderness wanderings, but in the desert. Hellooooo... Is anybody home?

Notes from the Internet

 

This from  http://marilynndawson.hubpages.com/hub/Badger-Skin-Ancient-Jewish-Bridal-Attire about Badger's skin - You can also see a picture of what Badger pelts look like.

Characteristics and Discussion

"The first point of interest, is that we are unable to consider this footwear without considering it's use first mentioned in Scripture, that of the outer covering of the Tabernacle. While the colour is indeed stated as unassuming and drab, the nature of the skin is what God was after. Badger skin has been well-known down through the ages as being excellent protection against the natural elements of storm, dust, and weather. While this author has never held a badger skin in her hands, it is said that the way the hair grows on the animal, water, ice and snow roll off it like water off a ducks back. So while the more colourful and rich fabrics were underneath, the badger skin protected the Tabernacle from all inclement weather the Hebrews would encounter on their travels. In addition, it was to cover the tables, altar, lamp stands, and Ark of the Covenant in transit. This gave a very unassuming appearance to a very important part of Tabernacle set up, protection and transportation."

 

 

The King James Bible is always right. Accept not substitutes.

 

Will Kinney

 

Return to Articles - http://brandplucked.webs.com/kjbarticles.htm